In a dramatic turn of events, Wendy Williams' ex-husband has been dealt a crushing blow in his legal battle over her guardianship, as a judge has dismissed his lawsuit entirely. But here's where it gets controversial: despite the setback, Kevin Hunter has been given a glimmer of hope to refile—but only if he leaves Wendy completely out of it. Could this be the end of his fight, or just the beginning of a new chapter in this tangled saga?
Published on October 9, 2025, at 10:26 AM PDT, this ruling marks a significant development in the ongoing drama surrounding Wendy Williams' personal and financial affairs. According to court documents obtained by TMZ, the judge rejected Kevin's attempt to sue as a so-called 'friend' of Wendy's, citing a lack of standing. However, the judge left the door slightly ajar, allowing Kevin to refile the case—but only if he focuses on his own claims and allegations, without involving Wendy.
And this is the part most people miss: Wendy herself has vehemently denied any involvement in the lawsuit, even calling into 'TMZ Live Stream' to express her frustration. She revealed that she has no idea how much money she has in her bank accounts, a startling admission that raises questions about her financial autonomy under guardianship. This detail alone adds another layer of complexity to an already contentious situation.
To recap, Kevin filed a federal lawsuit in New York back in June, seeking to release Wendy from the guardianship of Sabrina Morrissey. He claimed Wendy was being exploited and demanded a staggering $250 million in compensatory damages. Wendy, however, slammed the move as a 'cash grab,' insisting she had nothing to do with it. Now, with the lawsuit tossed out, Kevin is forced to regroup—but can he make a case without Wendy's involvement?
Here’s where it gets even more intriguing: Wendy's guardianship began in 2022 after Wells Fargo froze her bank accounts due to alleged suspicious activity. This raises a thought-provoking question: Was the guardianship truly necessary, or is there more to the story? Critics argue that such arrangements can sometimes be misused, while others believe they are essential for protecting vulnerable individuals. What do you think? Is Kevin fighting for justice, or is he overstepping his bounds?
Wendy and Kevin's divorce in 2020, after 21 years of marriage, was anything but amicable. The fallout has been messy, with this latest legal battle adding fuel to the fire. Now, with Kevin back to square one, the question remains: Will he persist, or will he walk away? And more importantly, what does this mean for Wendy's future?
Boldly put, this case is a stark reminder of the complexities surrounding guardianship, family dynamics, and financial control. It’s a story that sparks debate and invites differing opinions. Do you think Kevin has a legitimate claim, or is he overreaching? Share your thoughts in the comments—this is one conversation you won’t want to miss!
